\begin{table}[H]
\small
\centering
\caption{Male migration does not activate the economic channel}
\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}
\toprule
& \multicolumn{4}{c}{\textit{Farm income}} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{\textit{Log of household income (reported)}}\\
&(1)&(2)&(3)&(4)\\
\hline
                    &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(1)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(2)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(3)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(4)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(5)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(6)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(7)}   &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(8)}   \\

Migrant Husband     &    -12802.9***&    -10444.2***&     -1953.5   &           0   &       -0.14***&      -0.081** &      -0.028   &           0   \\
                    &    (1947.5)   &    (2027.0)   &    (1944.7)   &         (.)   &     (0.040)   &     (0.037)   &     (0.033)   &         (.)   \\
Wave 2              &      8750.5***&      8896.1***&      8236.2***&      8225.6***&        0.91***&        0.91***&        0.91***&        0.91***\\
                    &    (1506.3)   &    (1528.1)   &    (1538.7)   &    (1506.1)   &     (0.010)   &     (0.010)   &     (0.010)   &     (0.010)   \\
Migrant Husband $\times$ Wave 2&    -12096.9***&    -11828.5***&    -11952.3***&    -11702.7***&      -0.016   &      -0.013   &      -0.019   &      -0.020   \\
                    &    (2348.8)   &    (2363.5)   &    (2391.9)   &    (2364.5)   &     (0.042)   &     (0.042)   &     (0.042)   &     (0.042)   \\
\hline
Adj R-sq            &      0.0018   &      0.0111   &      0.0774   &      0.2776   &      0.1764   &      0.1977   &      0.4008   &      0.5529   \\
Observations        &       32949   &       32949   &       32949   &       32398   &       47891   &       47891   &       47888   &       47254   \\
Fixed Effects & None & District &Village &Household & None & District &Village &Household\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:main\_farm\_hh\_inc}
\begin{tablenotes}
\noindent Notes: DID analysis using household data show that male migration does not have a significant effect on household income. Therefore, while there is an overall increase in income for both groups of households, the increase among the households with migrants is no more that. However, it has a negative effect on farm income. The farm income includes income from land, crops/produce and animals for households in rural areas. In this analysis I include fixed effects at the district, village and household level. Standard errors are clustered at the village level (primary sampling unit). The results confirm that income is unlikely to increase due to male migration, and therefore the increase in autonomy among women is unlikely to be driven by this economic channel 
\end{tablenotes}
\end{table}
